GuideMiaGuideMia Technologies, LLC

Implant Master

Quick Start Guide

How a dental implant case runs through GuideMia Implant Master, from a folder of DICOM files to an exported surgical guide and a drilling report. The full-arch case leads, because it is the one that shows what the automation is for.

A generated full-arch surgical guide with four fixtures and three anchor pins

Everything follows from what the guide sits on

A surgical guide has the same three elements whatever the case: an adaption surface that fits the patient's anatomy, drilling holes with sleeves that embody the plan, and optional features such as irrigation and inspection windows. Which surface it adapts to is the decision that shapes every step that follows, and there are only two answers.

  • Tissue-borne

    Sits on the soft tissue and tooth surfaces, for non-invasive surgery. Built from an intra-oral scan, a scanned stone model, an impression, or a radiographic guide. The route this walkthrough follows.

  • Bone-borne

    Sits on the jaw bone, for surgery in which the tissue is reflected. Built from the CT scan itself: a model 2-3 mm thick derived from the bone and tooth structure, with the drilling holes cut into it.

Front matter

The showcase case

A full arch, planned end to end

A maxillary full arch on a radiographic guide: four fixtures, three anchor pins and a tissue/tooth-borne guide, from a folder of DICOM files to a printed drilling report. Five chapters, each one a page.

  1. Step 14 of 18

    Starting a full-arch case

    Why a full arch is usually a radiographic-guide case, loading the scan template and setting its threshold by measurement, and segmenting an edentulous ridge without the AI engine.

  2. Step 15 of 18

    Implants along the arch

    Copy Implant, which replicates a fixture's specification and angulation onto the next tooth, the safety zone across several fixtures, and the twenty-degree rule between neighbours.

  3. Step 16 of 18

    The virtual tissue model

    The step that exists only on a radiographic-guide case: reconstructing the tissue surface from the scan template, and reading the tissue-thickness map the software insists you look at.

  4. Step 17 of 18

    Anchor pins

    What holds a guide that has no teeth to seat on: placing pins, the colour change that is the only interference warning, and what the guide and the report do with them.

  5. Step 18 of 18

    The full-arch guide and report

    The plan validation gate and every criterion it checks, the guide parameters a long span needs, splitting, and the report a four-fixture case produces.

What the software does for you

A full arch is four to six of every decision a single unit makes once. These are the places GuideMia takes the repetition out, and each one is covered in the chapter named beside it.

  • AI segmentation of the whole jaw

    Roots, bone and the nerve channels together, from the CBCT, started in the background while you set the case up. Segmentation and nerve tracing become review steps rather than work.

    Covered in Step 3

  • Copy Implant along the arch

    Duplicates a fixture's make, model, size and angulation onto the next tooth, at a position the software estimates for that site. You choose the implant system once; every subsequent site inherits it.

    Covered in Step 15

  • Parallelism and the 20° check

    Make several fixtures parallel in one pass, and have the plan checked against the twenty-degree limit between neighbours before any guide is built.

    Covered in Step 15

  • Automatic drilling depth and abutment direction

    One depth rule applied across every site instead of each one set by hand, and abutment orientation derived rather than dialled in.

    Covered in Step 15

  • Plan validation before guide design

    Eleven criteria checked automatically — interference between implants, sleeves against anatomy, registration quality, slice thickness — with the failures named by tooth number and the override gated behind an explicit acknowledgement.

    Covered in Step 18

  • One click for every guide the case needs

    Generate/Update rebuilds the guide after any change of plan without re-tracing the outline, and on a case with reduction, plateau or combined guides it builds them all together.

    Covered in Step 18

The single-unit case, step by step

The full-arch chapters assume this one. A posterior mandibular site planned on a CBCT with an intra-oral scan, finishing in a tooth-supported guide — six stages, thirteen steps, in the order the work happens.

02

Viewing and diagnosis

Measurement and the archiving of diagnostic findings, alongside the planning tools rather than separate from them — the implant-centric cross section, bone quality and the panoramic reconstruction.

  1. Step 8 of 18

    The virtual tooth, and reviewing the plan

    Put the restoration on the plan, check it against the opposing arch, and satisfy yourself on bone, canal, restoration and occlusion before any geometry is built.

04

Simulation

There are always errors in the clinical outcome of an implant procedure, whatever the data and whatever the planning technology. This is where you find out whether the plan tolerates yours.

  1. Step 13 of 18

    Accuracy and planning error

    Where the deviation in a finished implant position comes from, which parts of it you control, and how plan error simulation tells you whether a plan tolerates the rest.

06

Manufacturing

A lab prints the guide from the exported STL and finishes it with drilling sleeves — the software does not produce a finished device. Manufacturing itself is outside this guide.

Part Three — reference

Two set-up tasks rather than case steps. Each is done once — when your implant system or your surgical kit is not one of the shipped ones — and then holds for everything you plan afterwards.

Before you start

  • The protocol decides the case

    Five scanning protocols are supported, and the one you used determines which guide family the case can produce. Metal artefact near the implant sites is what forces the dual scan with a radiographic guide.

  • This case is a single unit

    A posterior mandibular site, CBCT plus an intra-oral scan, a tooth-supported guide. Where the software offers a choice this case did not take, the step says so rather than walking it.

  • The guide is not a finished device

    What the software exports is geometry. The guide must be finished with drilling sleeves, and its fit verified on the patient before surgery — a guide that will not seat properly must not be used.

From here